|  | 
15th November 2008, 05:26 PM
|  | Newcomer | | Join Date: Nov 2008, 43 posts. Location: Telford Reputation:  | | Solid State Drives
Like To Here Peoples Views On These Drives,
i see they have started to get bigger in size, OCZ making a 128 Gb sata internal version, are they really worth the money?
__________________
Batman For Computers | 
15th November 2008, 05:28 PM
|  | Community Moderator | | Join Date: Oct 2007, 1,015 posts. Location: Stoke-on-Trent, England Reputation:  | |
You can now get 250GB ones, but the prices on them are ridiculous.
I think they're well worth buying, but i'd prefer to wait for them to mature, so that read/write cycles can increase, capacities get higher, more availability and price drops
__________________
"People always fear change. People feared electricity when it was invented, didn't they? People feared coal, they feared gas-powered engines... There will always be ignorance, and ignorance leads to fear. But with time, people will come to accept their silicon masters" - Bill Gates
| 
15th November 2008, 05:30 PM
|  | Newcomer | | Join Date: Nov 2008, 43 posts. Location: Telford Reputation:  | |
Thats the problem the Ocz 128Gb is Around £290, Certainly Considering It For x4 Build unless people convince me otherwise!
wow the 250Gb is expensive!!! Quote:
Originally Posted by Daveskater Adam951, please use the edit button if it has been less than 24 hours since your last post. Thanks.
Have the reliability issues with these drives been sorted out yet? |
As far as i can see reliabilty is pretty good the only problem with these drives is as nice as the silent function of them is, the read/write speeds are not up to much, perhaps a small sacrifice to pay for a silent pc?
As from next week i shall be using a hi-fi media style case, so want it nice and quiet! but can i afford the performance cut? il never know unless i try one of these drives! Quote:
Originally Posted by Rik I personally will wait until more people have tested these devices before taking the plunge.
As an example, a friend of mine got a sata1 drive the moment they came out. It only worked for a few weeks before frying. He had a lot of sensive data on that drive and so did not send it back for repair or replacement. That was a lot of money down the drain. | Actually yea i had the exact same problem, perhaps your right!
__________________
Batman For Computers
Last edited by Adam951; 16th November 2008 at 02:38 PM.
| 
15th November 2008, 07:33 PM
|  | Community Moderator | | Join Date: Dec 2007, 4,336 posts. Location: Oxford, UK Reputation:   | | |
Adam951, please use the edit button if it has been less than 24 hours since your last post. Thanks.
Have the reliability issues with these drives been sorted out yet?
__________________
Numberwang!
A little air on the earth.
| 
16th November 2008, 09:54 AM
|  | TST Master | | Join Date: Dec 2007, 2,042 posts. Location: England Reputation:  | | |
I personally will wait until more people have tested these devices before taking the plunge.
As an example, a friend of mine got a sata1 drive the moment they came out. It only worked for a few weeks before frying. He had a lot of sensive data on that drive and so did not send it back for repair or replacement. That was a lot of money down the drain.
__________________
[left][color=blue]"If at first you do not succeed, sit down, have a coffee, have a smoke, and think for a bit. If that still doesn't work, post it on TST".
| 
13th April 2009, 02:07 PM
|  | Newcomer | | Join Date: Jan 2008, 11 posts. Location: Central Arkansas, USA Reputation:  | | |
I've had a OCZ 60g Apex SSD for about three weeks or so, and to be honest, it's not what I expected. It's for sure quiet, and if nothing else, that's a big plus for me, but for what it cost, quiet alone does not cut it for me.
After reading all the reviews at NewEgg and other places about 10 second booting and all the other benchmarks that rave about SSD's, I'm very disappointed. Granted, it does boot a little faster, but that may be because I'm running Windows 7, 7068. And I'll admit that it seems to load games faster, namely HAWX, but again, that may be Win 7, just not sure, and I don't feel like going back to Vista or XP just to find out.
I think that for OCZ SSD's, the Vertex line is probably a lot faster, but of course more expensive. But I'm still not convinced that these drives are worth what they cost. I think the price WILL come down soon, as the one I bought at NewEgg has dropped $20 since I bought it, and I could now get the Vertex for the price I paid for a Apex.
After a lot of reading on the OCZ SSD forum, I saw a comment that you need a motherboard not over six months old in order to take full advantage of these drives. This is a big minus in my opinion since all of us cannot afford to upgrade our whole system every six months. My mobo is not that old and I feel anything coming out should be compatible, or I should say fully capable, for computers older than six months.
Anyway, I guess all this leads to my opinion, that SSD's are not worth the cost now. I wish I had gotten a 10,000rpm VelociRapter.
__________________
Be nice to people on your way up, because you may meet them on your way down.
| 
21st May 2009, 03:11 PM
|  | Newcomer | | Join Date: Jan 2008, 11 posts. Location: Central Arkansas, USA Reputation:  | | |
I don't suppose anybody's reading this, but here is a followup to my above post.
I finally decided that I've had enough of my SSD for a boot drive, got tired of the stuttering, slow write speed, and sure can't afford more of these things for a Raid array. So, I purchased two WD Caviar Black 500g drives and made a Raid 0 array. To me it seems much more snappy than the SSD. The reads are not as fast, but the writes are way faster, and all this to me kind of averages out to be more satisfying than the SSD. A good bit cheaper to, no actually a LOT cheaper, and a whole lot more space. To add to this, I can't believe how much faster it is than a single spindle drive.
Although I had no knowledge of Raid before this project, I've found it very enlightening after doing a lot of Googling. The Caviar Black drives are supposed to be fast anyway, but two of them are really fast. I might even get another one. From what I've read, over three of these drives in a Raid 0, might even be slower, taking more time to read multiple drives. If anybody has any experience with that option, (four drives), I would appreciate sharing.
One other thing I've learned because of the SSD. After reading all the things that need changing to optimize the SSD in OCZ forums, I've found out how much smaller you can make your Windows installation just by getting rid of the hybernation files, if you don't use this feature, it might be somthing to look at if you are short on space.
I realize the more drives that I have in Raid 0, the more chance of data loss I have, but I back up regularly to another drive what's important, so I'm not really worried about that. I'm still using the SSD, but just as any other drive, nothing special.
__________________
Be nice to people on your way up, because you may meet them on your way down.
| 
21st May 2009, 03:17 PM
|  | TST Oracle | | Join Date: Jul 2008, 8,106 posts. Location: UK Norfolk ..... Reputation:  | |
I am reading it
__________________ Life should NOT be a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving safely in an attractive and well preserved body, but rather to skid in sideways, chocolate in one hand, wine in the other, body thoroughly used up, totally worn out and screaming...
Damn, What a ride!! | 
21st May 2009, 09:05 PM
|  | Community Moderator | | Join Date: Dec 2007, 4,336 posts. Location: Oxford, UK Reputation:   | | |
As am I.
I'm not posting a whole lot but do read threads that look half worth reading.
__________________
Numberwang!
A little air on the earth.
| 
28th May 2009, 01:07 AM
|  | TST Member | | Join Date: Dec 2008, 176 posts. Location: Adelaide, South Australia Reputation:  | | |
Very interesting, ive heard a lot about these SSD drives how they are "so much better" but certainly wasn't considering buying one especially in AUS they have barely arrived. Dont think i will be buying one in the near future either after reading this, I'd much rather the large storage space rather than a fast drive that doesn't really seem to be much faster
| 
28th May 2009, 06:12 PM
|  | TST Oracle | | Join Date: Jul 2008, 8,106 posts. Location: UK Norfolk ..... Reputation:  | | Quote:
Originally Posted by Daveskater As am I.
I'm not posting a whole lot but do read threads that look half worth reading. | Thats very noble of you 
__________________ Life should NOT be a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving safely in an attractive and well preserved body, but rather to skid in sideways, chocolate in one hand, wine in the other, body thoroughly used up, totally worn out and screaming...
Damn, What a ride!! | 
18th January 2010, 02:42 PM
|  | Newcomer | | Join Date: Jan 2010, 3 posts. Reputation:  | | |
As an example, a friend of mine got a sata1 drive the moment they came out. It only worked for a few weeks before frying. He had a lot of sensive data on that drive and so did not send it back for repair or replacement. That was a lot of money down the drain.
|  | Only registered members can participate in forum threads. You must register or log in to contribute. All times are GMT. The time now is 09:27 PM.
|